Accessibility and AI
How AI can **help** accessibility (captions, alt text drafts, voice UIs) and how it can **harm** it (broken interfaces, biased ASR, inaccessible model UIs). UNESCO’s ethics Recommendation emphasizes inclusiveness, fairness/non-discrimina...
What it is
How AI can help accessibility (captions, alt text drafts, voice UIs) and how it can harm it (broken interfaces, biased ASR, inaccessible model UIs). UNESCO’s ethics Recommendation emphasizes inclusiveness, fairness/non-discrimination, and awareness/literacy—accessibility sits inside that civic frame.
Visual Spec & Architecture Diagram
Accessibility: captions, alt text, voice UI, contrast—AI helping vs AI excluding (biased speech models). WCAG-aware icons.
Why it matters
Inclusive design is part of civic AI literacy—not a niche addon. Procurement checklists should treat accessibility as a ship requirement.
How it works (plain)
Use AI as an assistant to human accessibility practice: generate drafts, then verify with people and standards. Don’t ship unlabeled AI captions as perfect. Keep keyboard/screen-reader paths first-class. Policy instruments that ban or tightly control certain biometric/surveillance uses (see EU Act risk tiers) can interact with assistive tech—seek counsel; not legal advice.
Everyday example
Auto-captions help many viewers; uncorrected error rates can exclude Deaf users in high-stakes meetings.
Try it
Run one AI feature with keyboard only. List three blockers.
Myths
- ⚠️ Myth: AI captions = done.
- ✓ Reality: Verification and human workflows remain.
- ⚠️ Myth: Accessibility is only a UI skin.
- ✓ Reality: Model errors (ASR, vision) are accessibility failures too.
Sources
- UNESCO ethics Recommendation: https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics ↗
- EU AI Act overview (transparency / high-risk examples): https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/ai-act-enters-force-2024-08-01_en ↗
- Course 13 speech; Course 19 fairness
